Idols
Which Beset Mens Minds
From Francis
Bacon, Novum Organum (1620)
Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was
an English statesman, essayist and philosopher. His most important
philosophical writings deal with the advantages he anticipated would
come from the Advancement of Learning and from general acceptance
of the new inductive logic set forth in his Novum Organum. His
emphasis on observation marks him as one of the early advocates of
the empirical method in modern philosophy.
I
Man,
being the servant and interpreter of nature, can do and understand
so much and so much only as he has observed in fact or in thought of
the course of nature: beyond this he neither knows anything nor can
do anything.
II
Neither
the naked hand nor the understanding left to itself can effect much. It
is by instruments and helps that the work is done, which are as much
wanted for the understanding as for the hand. And as the instruments
of the hand either give motion or guide it, so the instruments of the
mind supply either suggestions for the understanding or cautions.
III
Human
knowledge and human power meet in one; for where the cause is not known
the effect cannot be produced. nature to be commanded must be
obeyed; and that which in contemplation is as the cause is in operation
as the rule.
IV
Towards
the effecting of works, all that man can do is to put together or put
asunder natural bodies. The rest is done by nature working within.
V
The
study of nature with a view to works is engaged in by the mechanic,
the mathematician, the physician, the alchemist, and the magician;
but by all (as things now are) with slight endeavor and scanty success.
VI
It
would be an unsound fancy and self-contradictory to expect that things
which have never yet been done can be done except by means which have
never yet been tried.
VII
The
productions of the mind and hand seem very numerous in books and manufacturers. But
all this variety lies in an exquisite subtlety and derivations from
a few things already known; not in the number of axioms.
VIII
Moreover
the works already known are due to chance and experiment rather than
to sciences; for the sciences we now possess are merely systems for
the nice ordering and setting forth of things already invented; not
methods of invention or directions for new works.
IX
The
cause and root of nearly all evils in the sciences is thisthat
while we falsely admire and extol the powers of the human mind we neglect
to seek for its true helps.
X
The
subtlety of nature is greater many times over than the subtlety of
the senses and understanding; so that all those specious meditations,
speculations, and glosses in which men indulge are quite from the purpose,
only there is no one by to observe it.
XI
As
the sciences which we now have do not help us in finding out new works,
so neither does the logic which we now have help us in finding out
new sciences.
XII
The
logic now in use serves rather to fix and give stability to the errors
which have their foundation in commonly received notions, than to help
the search after truth. So it does more harm than good.
XIII
The
syllogism is not applied to the first principles of science, and is
applied in vain to intermediate axioms; being no match for the subtlety
of nature. It commands assent therefore to the proposition, but
does not take hold of the thing.
XIV
The
syllogism consists of propositions, propositions consist of words,
words are symbols of notions. Therefore, if the notions themselves
(which is the root of the matter) are confused and overhastily abstracted
from the facts, there can be no firmness in the superstructure. Our
only hope therefore lies in a true induction.
. . .
XXXVIII
The
idols and false notions which are now in possession of the human understanding,
and have taken deep root therein, not only so beset mens minds
that truth can hardly find entrance, but even after entrance obtained,
they will again in the very instruction of the sciences meet and trouble
us, unless men being forewarned of the danger fortify themselves as
far as may be possible against their assaults.
XXXIX
There
are four classes of Idols which beset mens minds. To
these for distinctions sake I have assigned names,calling
the first class Idols of the Tribe;
the second, Idols of the Cave;
the third, Idols of the Market-place;
the fourth, Idols of the Theatre.
XL
The
formation of ideas and axioms by true induction is no doubt the proper
remedy to be applied for the keeping off and clearing away of idols. To
point them out, however, is of great use; for the doctrine of Idols
is to the Interpretation of Nature what the doctrine of the refutation
of Sophisms is to common Logic.
XLI
The
Idols of the Tribe have
their foundation in human nature itself, and in the tribe or race
of men. For it is a false assertion that the sense of man
is the measure of things. On the contrary, all perceptions
as well of the sense as of the mind are according to the measure
of the individual and not according to the measure of the universe. And
the human understanding is like a false mirror, which, receiving
rays irregularly, distorts and discolours the nature of things
by mingling its own nature with it.
XLII
The
Idols of the Cave are
the idols of the individual man. For everyone (besides the
errors common to human nature in general) has a cave or den of
his own, which refracts and discolours the light of nature; owing
either to his own proper and peculiar nature; or to his education
and conversation with others; or to the reading of books, and the
authority of those whom he esteems and admires; or to the differences
of impressions, accordingly as they take place in a mind preoccupied
and predisposed or in a mind indifferent and settled; or the like. So
that the spirit of man (according as it is meted out to different
individuals) is in fact a thing variable and full of perturbation,
and governed as it were by chance. Whence it was well observed
by Heraclitus that men look for sciences in their own lesser worlds,
and not in the greater or common world.
XLIII
There
are also Idols formed by the intercourse and association of men with
each other, which I call Idols
of the Market-place, on account
of the commerce and consort of men there. For it is by discourse
that men associate; and words are imposed according to the apprehension
of the vulgar. And therefore the ill and unfit choice of words
wonderfully obstructs the understanding. Nor do the definitions
or explanations wherewith in some things learned men are wont to guard
and defend themselves, by any means set the matter right. But
words plainly force and overrule the understanding, and throw all into
confusion, and lead men away into numberless empty controversies and
idle fancies.
XLIV
Lastly,
there are Idols which have immigrated into mens minds from the
various dogmas of philosophies, and also from wrong laws of demonstration. These
I call Idols
of the Theatre; because in
my judgment all the received systems are but so many stage-plays, representing
worlds of their own creation after an unreal and scenic fashion. Nor
is it only of the systems now in vogue, or only of the ancient sects
and philosophies, that I speak; for many more plays of the same kind
may yet be composed and in like artificial manner set forth; seeing
that errors the most widely different have nevertheless causes for
the most part alike. Neither again do I mean this only of entire
systems, but also of many principles and axioms in science, which by
tradition, credulity, and negligence have come to be received.
But
of these several kinds of Idols I must speak more largely and exactly,
that the understanding may be duly cautioned.
[Here
begins his discussion of Idols of the Tribe]
XLV
The
human understanding is of its own nature prone to suppose the existence
of more order and regularity in the world than it finds. And
though there be many things in nature which are singular and unmatched,
yet it devises for them parallels and conjugates and relatives which
do not exist. Hence the fiction that all celestial bodies move
in perfect circles; spirals and dragons being (except in name) utterly
rejected. Hence too the element of Fire with its orb is brought
in, to make up the square with the other three which the sense perceives. Hence
also the ratio of density of the so-called elements is arbitrarily
fixed at ten to tone. And so on of other dreams. And these
fancies affect not dogmas only, but simple notions also.
XLVI
The
human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as
being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all
things else to support and agree with it. And though there be
a greater number and weight of instances to be found on the other side,
yet these it either neglects and despises, or else by some distinction
sets aside and rejects; in order that by this great and pernicious
predetermination the authority of its former conclusions may remain
inviolate. And therefore it was a good answer that was made by
one who when they showed him hanging in a temple a picture of those
who had paid their vows as having escaped shipwreck, and would have
him say whether he did not now acknowledge the power of the gods, Aye, asked
he again, but where are they painted that were drowned after
their vows? And such is the way of all superstition, whether
in astrology, dreams, omens, divine judgments, or the like; wherein
men, having a delight in such vanities, mark the events where they
are fulfilled, but where they fail, though this happen much oftener,
neglect and pass them by. But with far more subtlety does this
mischief insinuate itself into philosophy and the sciences; in which
the first conclusion colours and brings into conformity with itself
all that come after though far sounder and better. Besides, independently
of that delight and vanity which I have described, it is the peculiar
and perpetual error of the human intellect to be more moved and excited
by affirmatives than by negatives; whereas it ought properly to hold
itself indifferently disposed towards both alike. Indeed in the
establishment of any true axiom, the negative instance is the more
forcible of the two.
XLVII
The
human understanding is moved by those things most which strike and
enter the mind simultaneously and suddenly, and so fill the imagination;
and then it feigns and supposes all other things to be somehow, though
it cannot see how, similar to those few things by which it is surrounded. But
for that going to and fro to remote and heterogeneous instances, by
which axioms are tried as in the fire, the intellect is altogether
slow and unfit, unless it be forced thereto by severe laws and overruling
authority.
XLVIII
The
human understanding is unquiet; it cannot stop or rest, and still presses
onward, but in vain. Therefore it is that we cannot conceive
of any end or limit to the world; but always as of necessity it occurs
to us that there is something beyond. Neither again can it be
conceived how eternity has flowed down to the present day: for
that distinction which is commonly received of infinity in time past
and in time to come can by no means hold; for it would thence follow
that one infinity is greater than another, and that infinity is wasting
away and tending to become finite. The like subtlety arises touching
the infinite divisibility of lines, from the same inability of thought
to stop. But this inability interferes more mischievously in
the discovery of causes; for although the most general principles in
nature ought to be held merely positive, as they are discovered, and
cannot with truth be referred to a cause; nevertheless the human understanding
being unable to rest still seeks something prior in the order of nature. And
then it is that in struggling towards that which is further off it
falls back upon that which is more nigh at hand; namely, on final causes;
which have relation clearly to the nature of man rather than to the
nature of the universe; and from this source have strangely defiled
philosophy. But he is no less an unskilled and shallow philosopher
who seeks causes of that which is most general, than he who in things
subordinate and subaltern omits to do so.
XLIX
The
human understanding is no dry light, but receives an infusion from
the will and affections; whence proceed sciences which may be called sciences
as one would. For what a man had rather were true he more
readily believes. Therefore he rejects difficult things from
impatience of research; sober things, because they arrow hope; the
deeper things of nature, from superstition; the light of experience,
from arrogance and pride, lest his mind should seem to be occupied
with things mean and transitory, things not commonly believed, out
of deference to the opinion of the vulgar. Numberless in short
are the ways, and sometimes imperceptible, in which the affections
colour and infect the understanding.
L
But
by far the greatest hindrance and aberration of the human understanding
proceeds from the dullness incompetency, and deceptions of the senses;
in that things which strike the sense outweigh things which do not
immediately strike it, though they be more important. Hence it
is that speculation commonly ceases where sight ceases; insomuch that
of things invisible there is little or no observation. Hence
all the working of the spirits inclosed in tangible bodies lies hid
and unobserved of men. So also all the more subtle changes of
form in the parts of coarser substances (which they commonly call alteration,
though it is in truth local motion through exceedingly small spaces)
is in like manner unobserved. And yet unless these two things
just mentioned be searched out and brought to light, nothing great
can be achieved in nature, as far as the production of works is concerned. So
again the essential nature of our common air, and of all bodies less
dense than air (which are very many), is almost unknown. For
the sense by itself is a thing infirm and erring; neither can instruments
for enlarging or sharpening the senses do much; but all the truer kind
of interpretation of nature is effected by instances and experiments
fit and apposite, wherein the sense decides touching the experiment
only, and the experiment touching the point in nature and the thing
itself.
LI
The
human understanding is of its own nature prone to abstractions and
gives a substance and reality to things which are fleeting. But
to resolve nature into abstractions is less to our purpose than to
dissect her into parts; as did the school of Democritus, which went
further into nature than the rest. Matter rather than forms should
be the object of our attention, its configurations and changes of configuration,
and simple action, and law of action or motion; for forms are figments
of the human mind, unless you will call those laws of action forms.
LII
Such
then are the idols which I call Idols of the Tribe; and which take
their rise either from the homogeneity of the substance of the human
spirit, or from its preoccupation, or from its narrowness, or from
it restless motion, or from an infusion of the affections, or from
the incompetency of the senses, or from the mode of impression.
[Here
ends his discussion of Idols of the Tribe]
[Here
begins his discussion of Idols of the Cave]
LIII
The
Idols of the Cave take their
rise in the peculiar constitution, mental or bodily, of each individual;
and also in education, habit, and accident. Of this kind there
is a grat number and variety; but I will instance those the pointing
out of which contains the most important caution, and which have
most effect in disturbing the clearness of the understanding.
LIV
Men
become attached to certain particular sciences and speculations, either
because they fancy themselves the authors and inventors thereof, or
because they have bestowed the greatest pains upon them and become
most habituated to them. But men of this kind, if they betake
themselves to philosophy and contemplations of a general character,
distort and colour them in obedience to their former fancies; a thing
especially to be noticed in Aristotle, who made his natural philosophy
a mere bond-servant to his logic, thereby rendering it contentious
and well nigh useless. The race of chemists again out of a few
experiments of the furnace have built up a fantastic philosophy, framed
with reference to a few things; and Gilbert also, after he had employed
himself most laboriously in the study and observation of the lodestone,
proceeded at once to construct an entire system in accordance with
his favourite subject.
LV
There
is one principal and as it were radical distinction between different
minds, in respect of philosophy and the sciences; which is this: that
some minds are stronger and apter to mark the differences of things,
others to mark their resemblances. The steady and acute mind
can fix its contemplations and dwell and fasten on the subtlest distinctions;
the lofty and discursive mind recognizes and puts together the finest
and most general resemblances. Both kinds, however, easily err
in excess, by catching the one at gradations, the other at shadows.
LVI
There
are found some minds given to an extreme admiration of antiquity, others
to an extreme love and appetite for novelty; but few so duly tempered
that they can hold the mean, neither carping at what has been well
laid down by the ancients, nor despising what is well introduced by
the moderns. This, however, turns to the great injury of the
sciences and philosophy: since these affectations of antiquity
and novelty are the humours of partisans rather than judgments; and
truth is to be sought for not in the felicity of any age, which is
an unstable thing, but in the light of nature and experience, which
is eternal. These factions therefore must be abjured, and care
must be taken that the intellect be not hurried by them into assent.
LVII
Contemplations
of nature and of bodies in their simple form break up and distract
the understanding, while contemplations of nature and bodies in their
composition and configuration overpower and dissolve the understanding;
a distinction well seen in the school of Leucippus and Democritus as
compared with the other philosophies. For that school is so busied
with the particles that it hardly attends to the structure; while the
others are so lost in admiration of the structure that they do not
penetrate to the simplicity of nature. These kinds of contemplation
should therefore be alternated and taken by turns; that so the understanding
may be rendered at once penetrating and comprehensive, and the inconveniences
above mentioned, with the idols which proceed from them, may be avoided.
LVIII
Let
such then be our provision and contemplative prudence for keeping off
and dislodging the Idols of the Cave , which grow for the most
part either out of the predominance of a favourite subject, or out
of an excessive tendency to compare or to distinguish, or out
of partiality for particular ages, or out of the largeness or minuteness
of the objects contemplated. And generally let every student
of nature take this as a rule, that whatever his mind seizes
and dwells upon with peculiar satisfaction is to be held in suspicion,
and that so much the more care is to be taken in dealing with such
questions to keep the understanding even and clear.
[Here
ends his discussion of Idols of the Cave]
[Here
begins his discussion of Idols of the Market-place]
LIX
But
the Idols of the Market-place are
the most troublesome of all; idols which have crept into the understanding
through the alliances of words and names. For men believe that
their reason governs words; but it is also true that words react on
the understanding; and this it is that has rendered philosophy and
the sciences sophistical and inactive. Now words, being commonly
framed and applied according to the capacity of the vulgar, follow
those lines of division which are most obvious to the vulgar understanding. And
whenever an understanding of greater acuteness or a more diligent observation
would alter those lines to suit the true divisions of nature, words
stand in the way and resist the change. Whence it comes to pass
that the high and formal discussions of learned men end oftentimes
in disputes about words and names; with which (according to the use
and wisdom of the mathematicians) it would be more prudent to begin,
and so by means of definitions reduce them to order. Yet even
definitions cannot cure this evil in dealing with natural and material
things; since the definitions themselves consist of words, and those
words beget others; so that it is necessary to recur to individual
instances, and those in due series and order; as I shall say presently
when I come to the method and scheme for the formation of notions and
axioms.
LX
The
Idols imposed by words on the understanding are of two kinds. They
are either names of things which do not exist (for as there are things
left unnamed through lack of observation, so likewise are there names
which result from fantastic suppositions and to which nothing in reality
corresponds), or they are names of things which exist, but yet confused
and ill-defined, and hastily and irregularly derived from realities. Of
the former kind are Fortune, the Prime Mover, Planetary Orbits, Elements
of Fire, and like fictions which owe their origin to false and idle
theories. And this class of idols is more easily expelled, because
to get rid of them it is only necessary that all theories should be
steadily rejected and dismissed as obsolete.
But
the other class, which springs out of a faulty and unskillful abstraction,
is intricate and deeply rooted. Let us take for example such
a word as humid, and see how far the several things which the word
is used to signify agree with each other; and we shall find the word
humid to be nothing else than a mark loosely and confusedly applied
to denote a variety of actions which will not bear to be reduced to
any constant meaning. For it both signifies that which easily
spreads itself round any other body; and that which in itself is indeterminate
and cannot solidize; and that which readily yields in every direction;
and that which easily divides and scatters itself; and that which easily
unites and collects itself; and that which readily flows and is put
in motion; and that which clings to another body and wets it; and that
which is easily reduced to a liquid, or being solid easily melts. Accordingly
when you come to apply the word, if you take it in one sense,
flame is humid; if in another, air is not humid; if in another, fine
dust is humid; if in another, glass is humid., So that it is
easy to see that the notion is taken by abstraction only from water
and common and ordinary liquids, without any due verification.
There
are however in words certain degrees of distortion and error. One
of the least faulty kinds is that of names of substances, especially
of lowest species and well-deduced (for the notion of chalk and of
mud is good, of earth bad); a more faulty kind is that of actions,
as to generate, to corrupt, to alter; the most faulty is of qualities
(except such as are the immediate objects of the sense) as heavy, light,
rare, dense, and the like. Yet in all these cases some notions
are of necessity a little better than others, in proportion to the
greater variety of subjects that fall within the range of the human
sense.
[Here
ends his discussion of Idols of the Market-place]
[Here
begins his discussion of Idols of the Theatre]
LXI
But
the Idols of the Theatre are
not innate, nor do they steal into the understanding secretly, but
are plainly impressed and received into the mind from the play-books
of philosophical systems and the perverted rules of demonstration.
To attempt refutations in this case would be merely inconsistent with
what I have already said; for since we agree neither upon principles
nor upon demonstrations there is no place for argument. And this
is so far well, inasmuch as it leaves the honour of the ancients untouched. For
they are no wise disparagedthe question between them and me being
only as to the way. For as the saying is, the lame man who keeps
the right road outstrips the runner who takes a wrong one. Nay,
it is obvious that when a man runs the wrong way, the more active and
swift he is the further he will go astray.
But
the course I propose for the discovery of sciences is such as leaves
but little to the acuteness and strength of wits, but places all wits
and understandings nearly on a level. For as in the drawing of
a straight line or a perfect circle, much depends on the steadiness
and practice of the hand, if it be done by aim of hand only, but if
with the aid of rule or compass, little or nothing; so is it exactly
with my plan. But though particular confutations would be of
no avail, yet touching the sects and general divisions of such systems
I must say something; something also touching the external signs which
show that they are unsound; and finally something touching the causes
of such great infelicity and of such lasting and general agreement
in error; that so the access to truth may be made less difficult, and
the human understanding may the more willingly submit to its purgation
and dismiss its idols.
LXII
Idols
of the Theatre, or of Systems, are many, and there can be and perhaps
will be yet many more. For were it not that now for many ages
mens minds have been busied with religion and theology; and were
it not that civil governments, especially monarchies, have been averse
to such novelties, even in matters speculative; so that men labour
therein to the peril and harming of their fortunes,not only unrewarded,
but exposed also to contempt and envy: Doubtless there would
have arisen many other philosophical sects like to those which in great
variety flourished once among the Greeks. For as on the phenomena
of the heavens many hypotheses may be constructed, so likewise (and
more also) many various dogmas may be set up and established on the
phenomena of philosophy. And in the plays of the philosophical theatre
you may observe the same thing which is found in the theatre of the
poets, that stories invented for the stage are more compact and elegant,
and more as one would wish them to be, than true stores out of history.
In
general however there is taken for the material of philosophy either
a great deal out of a few things, or a very little out of many things;
so that on both sides philosophy is based on too narrow a foundation
of experiment and natural history, and decides on the authority of
too few cases. For the Rational School of philosophers snatches
from experience a variety of common instances, neither duly ascertained
nor diligently examined and weighed, and leaves all the rest to meditation
and agitation of wit.
There
is also another class of philosophers, who having bestowed much diligent
and careful labour on a few experiments, have thence made bold to educe
and construct systems; wresting all other facts in a strange fashion
to conformity therewith.
And
there is yet a third class, consisting of those who out of faith and
veneration mix their philosophy with theology and traditions; among
whom the vanity of some has gone so far aside as to seek the origin
of science among spirits and genii. So that this patent stock
of errorsthis false philosophyis of three kinds; the Sophistical,
the Empirical, and the Superstitious.
LXIII
The
most conspicuous example of the first class was Aristotle, who corrupted
natural philosophy by this logic: fashioning the world out of
categories; assigning to the human soul, the noblest of substances,
a genus from words of the second intention; doing the business of density
and rarity (which is to make bodies of greater or less dimensions,
that is, occupy greater or less spaces), by the frigid distinction
of act and power: asserting that single bodies have each a single
and proper motion, and that if they participate in any other, then
this results from an external cause, and imposing countless other arbitrary
restrictions on the nature of things, being always more solicitous
to provide an answer to the question and affirm something positive
in words, than about the inner truth of things; a failing best shown
when his philosophy is compared with other system of note among the
Greeks. For the Homoeomera of Anaxagoras: the Atoms of
Leucippus and Democritus; the Heaven and Earth of Parmenides; the Strife
and Friendship of Empedocles; Heraclituss doctrine how bodies
are resolved into the indifferent nature of fire, and remoulded into
solids; have all of them some taste of the natural philosopher,some
savour of the nature of things, and experience, and bodies; whereas
in the physics of Aristotle you hear hardly anything but the words
of logic; which in his metaphysics also, under a more imposing name,
and more, forsooth, as a realist than a nominalist, he has handled
over again. Nor let any weight be given to the fact that in his
books on animals, and his problems, and other of his treatises, there
is frequent dealing with experiments. For he had come to his
conclusion before; he did not consult experience, as he should have
done, in order to the framing of his decisions and axioms; but having
first determined the question according to his will, he then resorts
to experience, and bending her into conformity with his placets leads
her about like a captive in a procession; so that even on this count
he is more guilty than his modern followers, the schoolmen, who have
abandoned experience altogether.
LXIV
But
the Empirical school of philosophy gives birth to dogmas more deformed
and monstrous than the Sophistical or Rational schools. For it
has its foundations not in the light of common notions (which, though
it be a faint and superficial light, is yet in a manner universal,
and has reference to many things) but in the narrowness and darkness
of a few experiments. To those, therefore, who are daily busied
with these experiments, and have infected their imagination with them,
such a philosophy seems probable and all but certain; to all men else
incredible and vain. Of this there is a notable instance in the
alchemists and their dogmas; though it is hardly to be found elsewhere
in these times, except perhaps in the philosophy of Gilbert. Nevertheless,
with regard to philosophies of this kind there is one caution not to
be omitted; for I foresee that if ever men are roused by my admonitions
to betake themselves seriously to experiment and bid farewell to sophistical
doctrines, then indeed through the premature hurry of the understanding
to leap or fly to universals and principles of things, great danger
may be apprehended from philosophies of this kind; against which evil
we ought even now to prepare.
LXV
But
the corruption of philosophy by superstition and an admixture of theology
is far more widely spread, and does the greatest harm, whether to entire
systems or to their parts. For the human understanding is obnoxious
to the influence of the imagination no less than to the influence of
common notions. For the contentious and sophistical kind of philosophy
ensnares the understanding; but this kind, being fanciful and tumid
and half poetical, misleads it more by flattery. For there is
in man an ambition of the understanding, no less than of the will,
especially in high and lofty spirits.
Of
this kind we have among the Greeks a striking example in Pythagoras,
though he united with it a coarser and more cumbrous superstition;
another in Plato and his school, more dangerous and subtle. It
shows itself likewise in parts of other philosophies, in the introduction
of abstract forms and final causes and first causes, with the omission
in most cases of causes intermediate, and the like. Upon this
point the greatest caution should be used. For nothing is so
mischievous as the apotheosis of error; and it is a very plague of
the understanding for vanity to become the object of veneration. Yet
in this vanity some of the moderns have with extreme levity indulged
so far as to attempt to found a system of natural philosophy on the
first chapters of Genesis, on the book of Job, and other parts of the
sacred writings; seeking for the dead among the living: which
also makes the inhibition and repression of it the more important,
because from this unwholesome mixture of things human and divine there
arises not only a fantastic philosophy but also a heretical religion. Very
meet it is therefore that we be sober-minded, and give to faith that
only which is faiths.
LXVI
So
much, then, for the mischievous authorities of systems, which are founded
either on common notions, or on a few experiments, or on superstition. It
remains to speak of the faulty subject-matter of contemplations, especially
in natural philosophy. Now the human understanding is infected
by the sight of what takes place in the mechanical arts, in which the
alteration of bodies proceeds chiefly by composition or separation,
and so imagines that something similar goes on in the universal nature
of things. From this source has flowed the fiction of elements,
and of their concourse for the formation of natural bodies. Again,
when man contemplates nature working freely, he meets with different
species of things, of animals, of plants, of minerals; whence he readily
passes into the opinion that there are in nature certain primary forms
which nature intends to educe, and that the remaining variety proceeds
from hindrances and aberrations of nature in the fulfillment of her
work, or from the collision of different species and the transplanting
of one into another. To the first of these speculations we owe
our primary qualities of the elements; to the other our occult properties
and specific virtues; and both of them belong to those empty compendia
of thought wherein the mind rests, and whereby it is diverted from
more solid pursuits It is to better purpose that the physicians
bestow their labour on the secondary qualities of matter, and the operations
of attraction, repulsion, attenuation, composition, dilatation, astriction,
dissipation, maturation, and the like; and were it not that by those
two compendia which I have mentioned (elementary qualities, to wit,
and specific virtues) they corrupted their correct observations in
these other matters,either reducing them to first qualities and
their subtle and incommensurable mixtures, or not following them out
with greater and more diligent observation to third and fourth qualities,
but breaking off the scrutiny prematurely,they had made much
greater progress. Nor are powers of this kind (I do not say the
same, but similar) to be sought for only in the medicines of the human
body, but also in the changes of all other bodies.
But
it is a far greater evil that they make the quiescent principles, wherefrom,
and not the moving principles, whereby, things are produced,
the object of their contemplation and inquiry. For the former
tend to discourse, the latter to works. Nor is there any value
in those vulgar distinctions of motion which are observed in the received
system of natural philosophy, as generation, corruption, augmentation,
diminution, alternation, and local motions. What they mean no
doubt is this: If a body, in other respects not changed, be moved
from its place, this is local motion; if without change of place
or essence, it be changed in quality, this is alteration; if
by reason of the change the mass and quantity of the body do not remain
the same, this is augmentation or diminution; if they
be changed to such a degree that they change their very essence and
substance and turn to something else, this is generation and corruption. But
all this is merely popular, and does not at all go deep into nature;
for these are only measures and limits, not kinds of motion. What
they intimate is how far, not by what means, or from what source. For
they do not suggest anything with regard either to the desires of bodies
or to the development of their parts; it is only when that motion presents
the thing grossly and palpably to the sense as different from what
it was, that they being to mark the division. Even when they
wish to suggest something with regard to the causes of motion, and
to establish a division with reference to them, they introduce with
the greatest negligence a distinction between motion natural and violent;
a distinction which is itself drawn entirely from a vulgar notion,
since all violent motion is also in fact natural; the external efficient
simply setting nature working otherwise than it was before. But
if, leaving all this, anyone shall observe (for instance) that there
is in bodies a desire of mutual contact, so as not to suffer the unity
of nature to be quite separated or broken and a vacuum thus made; or
if anyone say that there is in bodies a desire of resuming their natural
dimensions or tension, so that if compressed within or extended beyond
them, they immediately strive to recover themselves, and fall back
to their old volume and extent; or if anyone say that there is in bodies
a desire of congregating towards masses of kindred nature,of
dense bodies, for instance, towards the globe of the earth, of thin
and rare bodies towards the compass of the sky; all these and the like
are truly physical kinds of motion; but those others are entirely
logical and scholastic, as is abundantly manifest from this comparison.
Nor
again is it a less evil, that in their philosophies and contemplations
their labour is spent in investigating and handling the first principles
of things and the highest generalities of nature; whereas utility and
the means of working result entirely from things intermediate. Hence
it is that men cease not from abstracting nature till they come to
potential and uninformed matter, nor on the other hand from dissecting
nature till they reach the atom; things which, even if true, can do
but little for the welfare of mankind.
LXVII
A
caution must also be given to the understanding against the intemperance
which systems of philosophy manifest in giving or withholding assent;
because intemperance of this kind seems to establish Idols and in some
sort to perpetuate them, leaving no way open to reach and dislodge
them.
This
excess is of two kinds; the first being manifest in those who are ready
in deciding, and render sciences dogmatic and magisterial; the other
in those who deny that we can know anything, and so introduce a wandering
kind of inquiry that leads to nothing; of which kinds the former subdues,
the latter weakens the understanding. For the philosophy of Aristotle,
after having by hostile confutations destroyed all the rest (as the
Ottomans serve their brothers), has laid down the law on all points;
which done, he proceeds himself to raise new questions of his own suggestion,
and dispose of them likewise; so that nothing may remain that is not
certain and decided; a practice which holds and is in use among his
successors.
The
school of Plato, on the other hand, introduced Acatalepsia,[1] at
first in jest and irony, and in disdain of the older sophists, Protagoras,
Hippias, and the rest, who were of nothing else so much ashamed as
of seeming to doubt about anything. But the New Academy made
a dogma of it, and held it as a tenet. And though theirs is a
fairer seeming way than arbitrary decisions; since they say that they
by no means destroy all investigation, like Pyrrho and his Refrainers,
but allow of some things to be followed as probable, though of none
to be maintained as true; yet still when the human mind has once despaired
of finding truth, its interest in all things grows fainter; and the
result is that men turn aside to pleasant disputations and discourses
and roam as it were from object to object, rather than keep on a course
of severe inquisition. But, as I said at the beginning and am
ever urging, the human senses and understanding, weak as they are,
are not to be deprived of their authority, but to be supplied with
helps.
[Here
ends his discussion of Idols of the Theatre]
LXVIII
So
much concerning the several classes of Idols, and their equipage; all
of which must be renounced and put away with a fixed and solemn determination,
and the understanding thoroughly freed and cleansed; the entrance into
the kingdom of man, founded on the Sciences, being not much other than
the entrance into the kingdom of heaven, whereinto none may enter except
as a little child.
LXIX
But
vicious demonstrations are as the strongholds and defences of Idols;
and those we have in logic do little else than make the world the bond-slave
of human thought, and human thought the bond-slave of words. Demonstrations
truly are in effect the philosophies themselves and the sciences. For
such as they are well or ill established, such are the systems
of philosophy and the contemplations which follow. Now in the
whole of the process which leads from the sense and objects to axioms
and conclusions, the demonstrations which we use are deceptive and
incompetent. This process consists of four parts, and has as
many faults. In the first place, the impressions of the
sense itself are faulty; for the sense both fails us and deceives us. But
its shortcomings are to be supplied, and its deceptions to be corrected. Secondly,
notions are ill drawn from the impressions of the sense, and are indefinite
and confused, whereas they should be definite and distinctly bounded. Thirdly,
the induction is amiss which infers the principles of sciences by simple
enumeration, and does not, as it ought, employ exclusions and solutions
(or separations) of nature. Lastly, that method of discovery
and proof according to which the most general principles are first
established, and then intermediate axioms are tried and proved by them,
is the parent of error and the curse of all science. Of these
things however, which now I do but touch upon, I will speak more largely,
when, having performed these expiations and purgings of the mind, I
come to set forth the true way for the interpretation of nature.